Yes, but what do the first two have to do with the last two?Įxcellent question! That's where Zone Theory and Gibbontake's "Productivity Flow Chart" come into play.Īnd lastly, but by no means least, we find Utilization. While phronesis can create the prototype, it is techne that creates the production model.
#FLOWSTATE CHART HOW TO#
You have all the parts, and you have the guidelines of how to put them together. It's like building a lego set by the book. It's the most restrictive but also the most productive of the flowstates. You are constrained by the parts you are given, but you have the capacity to dream of the many possible combinations of those parts. I will analogize it to taking a box of legos (logoi) and constructing a building of your own design out of them.
#FLOWSTATE CHART FREE#
Phronesis has so many different and contradictory definitions that I feel relatively free to give my own without too much guilt. It's like creating a sculpture of a dragon from Play-Doh. Or perhaps like a monk deep in prayer, contemplating the ineffable essence of God. It's like a druid sitting in a dense forest hearing the heartbeat of the Earth, or a hippie vibing in his psychedelic wagon at the height of the countercultural revolution. The philosophers speak very little of it. The Greeks feared it and sometimes forbid it. It's like a potter sculpting a bowl from clay.īacchanalia is the state I understand the least. By removing everything extraneous, one is able to focus on the moment without hesitation and doubt. Mushin, then, is like a Zen garden, where everything has been stripped down to its bare essentials. Logoi can be sent between minds in a way that the pathe cannot, which makes them very useful. Pathe are like plants growing from your psychic landscape, while logoi are bricks built by cutting up the pathe into interchangeable parts. The first is filled with rigorous critters called logoi (lexemes) while the latter is laden with pathe (impressions). For the sake of this essay, I will divide the chart into the Apollonian sphere (lexicality) and the Dionysian sphere (impressionism). For the other three, I have chosen Greek concepts that I think fit closest to their "ideal flowstate": Bookkeepers represent techne or applied skill and craft, Human Calculators represent phronesis or wisdom in determining ends and the means of attaining them, and Newtypes represent bacchanalia or pure and unrestricted passion.Įach of these concepts could become their own book, but I will try to summarize how I see them.
We already know that Pure Instinct is mushin. I believe that each type can achieve each of these, at least to a limited extent. These will be based on the four cardinal types, but I am not going to limit them to those types. Thus I would like to propose a Four-Flowstate Theory. However, it has not yet been demonstrated or explained whether similar flowstates are applicable to other neurotypes, or if there are flowstates specific to certain neurotypes. The mind could be said to be working at a very high speed, but with no intention, plan or direction. It is not a state of relaxed, near-sleepfulness, however. At this point, a person relies not on what they think should be the next move, but what is their trained natural reaction (or instinct) or what is felt intuitively. There is an absence of discursive thought and judgment, so the person is totally free to act and react towards an opponent without hesitation and without disturbance from such thoughts. Per Wikipedia, mushin is achieved whenĪ person's mind is free from thoughts of anger, fear, or ego during combat or everyday life. It has thus been variously described as the mushin no shin or "mind without mind" of various Eastern philosophies. My original interest in neurotyping revolved around the concept of "flowstates." The concept was never well defined other than the example Digi gave of Donald Trump's "Pure Instinct Flowstate" where the President acted directly on his intuitions without the need for any detailed self-reflection.